Many Latino communities within the United States of America have grown to 50 million as indicated by statistical data in 2011. With the congress looking at the reform of immigration laws, the occurrence of racial profiling and discrimination continues to impact the lives of innocent people. The county sheriff case has raised considerable attention when it comes to unlawful practice and violation of rights for immigrants.
We believe that the United States reform will not prove beneficial for some of the skilled and legally employed. The small number of foreign workers in the States is required to undergo an extensive legal process in order to obtain a work visa and the renewal of citizenship on a 3 year basis. The procedure is long and costly with many difficulties encountered before the necessary green cards are issued.
These tedious procedures have resulted in a rise in illegal immigrants having entered the country as shorter methods are sough to obtain the necessary paperwork for citizenship. This is unfair for those who have legally obtained their status and still do not possess voting rights. It has contributed to more questions and concerns being raised with regards to fair and equal treatment of immigrants in the United States.
The trial that occurred over a 3 week period in the middle of the year, involved the sheriff and the discriminatory practice of racial profiling against Latinos and issuing of detentions. The investigations have indicated that the Phoenix Arizona authorities where implementing illegal measures resulting in singling out the Hispanic community members. The federal court recognized the fact that such unlawful practice violates the constitution and is considered un-American.
The immigration lawyers revealed that the accused would request papers from Latino individuals when detentions and traffic stops were applied. The court has ruled that Arpaio engaged in discriminatory practices that are in violation of the amendment according to the early 1960s Civil Rights Act. The Latino community and relevant organizations have celebrated the successful outcome against prejudice.
Studies have shown that over 22 percent of Latinos are discriminated against particularly in the workplace in comparison to reports made for unfair treatment by 6 percent of white populations. Even though a large number of Hispanics are working and living in this country illegally, there are many who have worked hard to achieve citizenship and contribute to society. It is the minority of Latinos who legally reside in the country who continue to experience discriminatory practice.
Evidence reveals that the sheriff was found to have violated the the clause for equal protection. Immigration lawyers have pointed out a number of public statements and other types of correspondence that involved a degree of prejudice and discrimination. Nancy Ramirez a member of the western counsel has concluded that racial profiling is ongoing, but the ruling is a step in the right direction.
The ruling regarding the Maricopa case has contributed to a decrease in cultural fears. The United States reform has focused on managing cases of illegal immigration; however, we believe that a greater level of awareness and education should be implemented in minority communities with regards to identifying discriminatory practice. Authorities need to update awareness of fair procedure and undergo counseling whereas public members are encouraged to increase their knowledge of the law and to report possible violations.
We believe that the United States reform will not prove beneficial for some of the skilled and legally employed. The small number of foreign workers in the States is required to undergo an extensive legal process in order to obtain a work visa and the renewal of citizenship on a 3 year basis. The procedure is long and costly with many difficulties encountered before the necessary green cards are issued.
These tedious procedures have resulted in a rise in illegal immigrants having entered the country as shorter methods are sough to obtain the necessary paperwork for citizenship. This is unfair for those who have legally obtained their status and still do not possess voting rights. It has contributed to more questions and concerns being raised with regards to fair and equal treatment of immigrants in the United States.
The trial that occurred over a 3 week period in the middle of the year, involved the sheriff and the discriminatory practice of racial profiling against Latinos and issuing of detentions. The investigations have indicated that the Phoenix Arizona authorities where implementing illegal measures resulting in singling out the Hispanic community members. The federal court recognized the fact that such unlawful practice violates the constitution and is considered un-American.
The immigration lawyers revealed that the accused would request papers from Latino individuals when detentions and traffic stops were applied. The court has ruled that Arpaio engaged in discriminatory practices that are in violation of the amendment according to the early 1960s Civil Rights Act. The Latino community and relevant organizations have celebrated the successful outcome against prejudice.
Studies have shown that over 22 percent of Latinos are discriminated against particularly in the workplace in comparison to reports made for unfair treatment by 6 percent of white populations. Even though a large number of Hispanics are working and living in this country illegally, there are many who have worked hard to achieve citizenship and contribute to society. It is the minority of Latinos who legally reside in the country who continue to experience discriminatory practice.
Evidence reveals that the sheriff was found to have violated the the clause for equal protection. Immigration lawyers have pointed out a number of public statements and other types of correspondence that involved a degree of prejudice and discrimination. Nancy Ramirez a member of the western counsel has concluded that racial profiling is ongoing, but the ruling is a step in the right direction.
The ruling regarding the Maricopa case has contributed to a decrease in cultural fears. The United States reform has focused on managing cases of illegal immigration; however, we believe that a greater level of awareness and education should be implemented in minority communities with regards to identifying discriminatory practice. Authorities need to update awareness of fair procedure and undergo counseling whereas public members are encouraged to increase their knowledge of the law and to report possible violations.
About the Author:
Visit http://www.immigrationlawyersla.com if you are looking for competent immigration lawyers in Los Angeles.
No comments:
Post a Comment